Re: [A-List] Henry C.K.L on the market

[Waistline2@xxxxxxx]

I follow the reference point given and copied the material from the abstract
as well as other material.

The article - "The Global Economy in Transition," was remarkable in its
clarity and perhaps two decades ahead of what is generally called "Western Marxism"
and the "Western Economist."  The "Western Marxism" and the "Western
Economist" tend to be lapdogs and apologize for their imperialist despite their
passionate indignation over the "plight" of the less developed peoples.

I considered your audience. The material was very passionate. Extremely sharp
and pointed.

Specifically, the historical description of money/capital and money -fiat,
along with clarifying the meaning of development and real capital formation was
an eye opener. I copied and put your article on Marxline and of course their
will probably be "no takers" - only fakers.

The distinction between the market and the economy runs against the grain of
the imperial attitude. The history of money - pardon, the use of currency in
America, presents the issue in a reasonably easy way to understand (this means
I had to read it only 4 times instead of my traditional 6-8 readings of
everything) .

I really understand why the so-called Marxist in America, cannot understand
something as simple as slavery in our own history. Understanding money is out
of the question for them. Interesting, some of these same folks tend to be the
people that have judged earth and present the answers to all questions. Talk
about lapdogs of imperialism.

Back in the late 1960s when we capture Wayne State University Student
newspaper, we put the words "One Class Conscious Worker is Worth One husand Students"
and would pass out copies at the local plants and in the community.

One Class Conscius Investor/Banker IS Worth One Thousand Marxists.

Melvin P.