A-list
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON



Thanks for correcting my misunderstanding, Michael.  I was at a loss to understand your post as I originally took it, and
somehow connect it to the brilliant and gentlemanly Michael Hudson I know.  And, yes, clearly I do share your concerns
about the televangelists' "rapture" theology and their noxious political impact.  BTW, though Gary North is a "right winger"
in the way that I am a "right-winger" (Austrian School), I think you would find his books on Biblical economics of interest.
I'd always assumed that North must have been reared in a committed Christian household, but apparently that isn't the
case.  (And when I learned he is Rushdooney's son-in-law, I understood his faith was deeply felt or else the old man would
never have handed over his daughter :-) In fact, he became a Christian as an adult and made it his personal life's ambition
as an economist and a Christian to write a book on the economics of each of the Bible's books - so those books are his
life's true work (www.freebooks.com).  Thanks again for the correction; I'll be able to sleep tonight even in this miserable
NYC heat. -A.     
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON

In a message dated 6/26/03 7:33:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, annewilliamson@xxxxxxx writes:


Michael,

I don't believe you are a theologan, and your representation of Christianity is deeply incorrect.
It's nonsense that Christians believe they should act as the avenging arm of God "against
anybody who would criticize the rich, thereby turning the Bible on its head."  Where do you get
such ideas?  Not from the Bible, Christ's teachings, or regular Church attendance.  Nor do I
believe you attend revival meetings regularly, and perhaps stumbled upon one once in your life.  
Apparently, it was dramatic.

"Rapture" Christians are an off-shoot of Protestantism, and you should know that the thrust of
their beliefs were advanced by a conman named Cyrus Scofield, who spun out the ideas of an
obscure early 18th century Reverend Darby, a Scotsman, at the urging and with the support of
Sam Untemeyer, a prominent Zionist of the early 19th century - who, in turn, managed to get
Oxford Publishing to bring out Scofield's Biblical concordance.  This trash document is used
by Jerry Falwell, who is about the only Christian minister allowed a fulltime television network -
and if you turn it on, you will see that most of the programing is concerned with Israel.  Perhaps
this is why he flies around in a private jet Ariel Sharon presented to him.

Currently I am involved in an onrunning legal battle with "rapture" elements, who I believe murdered
my father.  So you needn't think this message is a defense of those people; they are "angry,"
self-righteous, disturbed, frighteningly materialistic, alarmingly misguided, and easily "played"
by likes of Bush, DeLay, Falwell, etc.  But the real story isn't them, but the men who "play" them -
and that story begins with Darby, Scofield, and Untemeyer, and it involves Zionist aspirations
more largely than any bona fide Christian tenets.

But to take the ambitions, activities, and theories of these pathetic, nominal "Christians" and present
them as the guiding spirit and the very heart of Christendom is not only inaccurate, but deeply offensive.  

Anne        




Dear Anne,
      I didn't mean my remarks at all the way you took them.
      Of course I wasn't talking about REAL Christianity. (I am active in Church of England circles, and have given sermons in two churches in London in the past year, worked for many years with the Vatican, and also with various Protestant groups, by the way.) I'm talking about right-wing televangelism and its politics, and I gather from your message that you and I have identical feelings toward them.
      Obviously these guys have hijacked and vulgarized Christianity. My point was how basically different and right-wing these Americans are (and also the Koreans, for that matter) in comparison to the left-wing tendencies of European Christianity - which is why my Christian contacts are all over there, not over here.
      I hope this helps clarify matters. It did not occur to me that you would think that I mistook them for the real thing.

      Michael


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]