|
Michael,
I don't believe you are a theologan, and your
representation of Christianity is deeply incorrect.
It's nonsense that Christians believe they should
act as the avenging arm of God "against
anybody who would criticize the rich, thereby
turning the Bible on its head." Where do you get
such ideas? Not from the Bible, Christ's
teachings, or regular Church attendance. Nor do I
believe you attend revival meetings regularly, and
perhaps stumbled upon one once in your
life.
Apparently, it was dramatic.
"Rapture" Christians are an off-shoot of
Protestantism, and you should know that the thrust of
their beliefs were advanced by a conman named Cyrus
Scofield, who spun out the ideas of an
obscure early 18th century Reverend Darby, a Scotsman, at the urging and with the
support of
Sam Untemeyer, a prominent Zionist of the early 19th century - who, in turn, managed to
get
Oxford Publishing to bring out Scofield's Biblical
concordance. This trash document is used
by Jerry Falwell, who is about the only Christian
minister allowed a fulltime television network -
and if you turn it
on, you will see that most of the programing is concerned with Israel.
Perhaps
this is why he flies
around in a private jet Ariel Sharon presented to him.
Currently I am involved in an onrunning legal
battle with "rapture" elements, who I believe murdered
my father. So you needn't think this message
is a defense of those people; they are "angry,"
self-righteous, disturbed, frighteningly
materialistic, alarmingly misguided, and easily "played"
by likes of Bush, DeLay, Falwell, etc. But
the real story isn't them, but the men who "play" them -
and that story begins with Darby, Scofield, and
Untemeyer, and it involves Zionist aspirations
more largely than any bona fide Christian
tenets.
But to take the ambitions, activities, and theories
of these pathetic, nominal "Christians" and present
them as the guiding
spirit and the very heart of Christendom is not only inaccurate, but deeply
offensive.
Anne
|
- Re: Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, (continued)
- Re: Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, annewilliamson Thu 26 Jun 2003, 23:30 GMT
- Re: Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, Xenon Zi-Neng Yuan Thu 26 Jun 2003, 23:55 GMT
- Re: Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, Anyutka Fri 27 Jun 2003, 00:33 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, Hudsonmi Thu 26 Jun 2003, 21:37 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, annewilliamson Thu 26 Jun 2003, 23:32 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, Hudsonmi Thu 26 Jun 2003, 21:38 GMT
- RE: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, bon moun Fri 27 Jun 2003, 12:21 GMT
- [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, Sabri Oncu Thu 26 Jun 2003, 23:41 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Re: COUP d' ETAT IN WASHINGTON, Anyutka Fri 27 Jun 2003, 00:00 GMT