A-list
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[A-List] Austria, France and Brazil



Austria, France and Brazil
José Reinaldo Carvalho (*)
The Central Europe is showing signs of a broad, intense labor and popular mobilization. In Austria, a conservative country of high living standards, a place that almost never is object to news regarding social conflicts, the first general strike in 50 took place as workers from all categories stopped their activities and performed several protests, including the suspension of rail transportation and the blockade of border posts. Less than a week after the end of the general strike, the teachers of primary schools began a new strike. France, where the workers? struggles are frequent and always call the attention for the combativeness of their actions, bring us good news regarding a great strike movement that paralyzed the country and took about 2 million people to the streets of the main cities. A common reason motivated the struggles of the Austrian and French citizens: the announcement by both governmentsunsurprisingly right-wing onesof reforms to be undertaken to the social security system, which are viewed as socially regressive by the Austrian and French unions, as well as by many anti-capitalist and left-wing political forces.
The facts reveal the existence of social discontentment and disquiet in the countries that lie in the heart of the European capitalist system. They also reveal that, despite the political hegemony of right-wing and right-of-center forces and, in some cases, of so-called left-wing forces that govern according to a right-wing program, and also despite the control of moderate trends in the union movement, the environment is prone to struggle, something that no control is able to refrain.
The strikes in Austria and France constitute another answer from European workers to the attempts of the conservative bourgeoisie at imposing anti-social models, a doubtlessly explosive matter since workers gained benefits that are the result of strenuous struggles that lasted decades. The 1990?s were characterized by many similar attempts at reforming the social security systems and also the labor legislation in many European countries. All of them deserved answers that were either in the form of strikes of in the form of street demonstrations. Some took a political character. Also in France a similar attempt at reforming the social security system at the expense of the labor rights caused the collapse of Juppé?s right-wing administration in 1995. During 24 days the country was paralyzed in a memorable strike movement that reintroduced the workers in the scene of political and social confrontation. Italy, Greece, Portugal and Germany also had to face similar attempts at reforms and the reactions of the workers in those countries were not weak.
The common aspectthe attempt at imposing socially regressive reforms in social security and labor legislationin a situation marked by growing economic and social instability and the incidence of crises in an unforeseen frequency reveals that the essential character of the program of the dominant classes in the capitalist system in the present conditions is the restriction of economic and social rights (and also political ones, but that is another story), what constitutes a brutal offensive against the workers.
 Here in Brazil, a country not similar to Austria or France as regarding the political reality and the social and economic indicators, the workers are also facing an attempt at reforming the social security as a change in the labor legislation is also to be made. In our case, we live the paradox of those reforms being about to be approved due to an initiative of a government headed by left-wing forces, which were recently sanctioned in the elections as a result of its opposition to the neoliberal government of former president Fernando Henrique Cardoso. It is not the case of making a comparison between the aforementioned countries and Brazil. But there is no doubt that a common character is that, in the reform that is being proposed here, the logic of some of its aspects is cutting the rights of those who are working and also weakening the national State as a result of a fiscal conception of reducing public expenditure.
In Brazil, the reforms in the social security system and the labor and union legislation were designed by the International Monetary Fund with the help of the previous administration. They were partially approvedand partially rejected due to the opposition of the workers? movement and the left-wing parties. Constrained by a very precarious economic and financial situation inherited from the previous government, which left the country vulnerable to the blackmail of international financial organizations, the new government feels impelled to conclude such reforms believing that, by finishing the agenda of the previous administration, the country will regain its breath and retake development after two lost decades. Broad sectors of the union movement oppose cutting rights. The Union Class Current, a communist organization of union intervention, constructively addresses the government with a set of demands that preserve the rights of the workers in the reforms.
In a political environment marked by popular expectation regarding the fulfillment of the democratic and popular program of the forces that elected President Lula, the workers will struggle in the defense of the social security and for labor achievements, what strategically favors the consolidation of the new government, since social regression is not a character of democratic and popular forces.
------------------
(*) Journalist. Vice-president of Communist Party of Brazil  PCdoB, responsible for International Relations
PCdoB - Secretaria de Relações Internacionais <internacional@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]