A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] A Democratic Iraq? Don't Hold Your Breath
A Democratic Iraq? Don't Hold Your Breath
by Patrick Basham
http://www.cato.org/dailys/03-31-03.html
Patrick Basham is senior fellow in the Center for Representative Government
at the Cato Institute.
The Bush administration's plan for the reconstruction of a post-Saddam Iraq
includes the laudable goal of a democratic political system. This new
democracy, it is argued, will serve as a model throughout the Islamic world,
like the so-called Velvet Revolution that swept across Eastern Europe at the
Cold War's end. Unfortunately, the White House will be disappointed with the
short-to-medium-term result of its effort to establish a stable democracy in
Iraq, or any other nation home to a large Muslim population.
This pessimism stems from an appreciation of what causes democracy to
flourish in a society. Political scientist Ronald Inglehart, an expert on
political culture and democratic values, studied the responses to the "World
Values Survey," which provides data from more than 70 countries, including
10 Islamic nations, ranging from dictatorships to Western democracies.
Inglehart analyzed the empirical linkages between the survey responses
within each society and a society's level of democracy, as measured by the
Freedom House political rights and civil liberties index. As a result, he
concludes that "the prospects for democracy in Islamic countries seem
particularly poor."
Although only one in four countries with a Muslim majority is an electoral
democracy, in most Muslim countries a high level of popular support exists
for the concept of democracy. But that's not enough. According to Inglehart,
"overt support for democracy seems a necessary but not sufficient condition
for democratic institutions to emerge." Other factors are necessary.
The long-term survival of democratic institutions requires a particular
political culture that solidly supports democracy. The following cultural
factors play an essential, collective role in stimulating and reinforcing a
stable democratic political system:
Political trust, i.e., the assumption that one's opponent will accept the
rules of the democratic process and surrender power if he loses an election;
Social tolerance, i.e., the acceptance of unpopular groups (e.g.,
homosexuals);
Economic development (a high standard of living legitimizes both democratic
institutions and incumbent politicians);
Popular support for gender equality; and a
High priority on freedom of speech and popular participation in
decision-making.
According to Inglehart, among Islamic societies, levels of trust, tolerance,
economic well-being, gender equality, and the priority given to political
activism fall far short of what is found in all established democracies.
As in other societies, the condition of Islamic democracy is tied to the
respective political culture, which is clearly tied to the respective level
of economic development. This is because democratization is much more likely
to occur - and to take hold - in richer rather than in poorer nations. A
higher standard of living breeds values that demand greater democracy.
Hence, Turkey, the most economically developed and socially tolerant Islamic
country, is currently in a democratic transition zone with the likes of
South Africa. Meanwhile, the Iranian political culture exhibits positive
signs of democratization, as befits the second wealthiest Islamic country.
But like so many of its poor brethren, Iraq will not be a stable democratic
nation until it is much wealthier than at present.
However, President Bush's plan for the democratization of Iraq is premised
upon the adoption of a constitution that will be successfully implemented in
the short-term by groups of Iraqi elites bargaining among one another. Bush
is placing a large wager that the formation of democratic institutions in
Iraq can stimulate a democratic political culture. If he's correct, it will
constitute a democratic first.
On the contrary, the available evidence strongly suggests that the causal
relationship works the other way round. During the 1990s, two leading
political scientists studied 131 countries and concluded that economic
development causes higher levels of democratic values in the political
culture that, in turn, produce higher, more stable levels of democracy. In
sum, a political culture shapes democracy far more than democracy shapes the
political culture.
Therefore, the Iraqi democratic reconstruction project will be a good deal
harder than White House theorists expect. In practice, the realization of
Iraq's democratic potential will depend more on the introduction of a free
market economic system and its long-term positive influence on Iraqi
political culture than on a United Nations-approved election.
- Thread context:
- [A-List] US military: precision bombing (cf. Afghanistan),
Michael Keaney Tue 08 Apr 2003, 13:10 GMT
- [A-List] "El Papa y la cruzada contra Aznar" (31/03/03),
Gustavo Priotti Tue 08 Apr 2003, 12:40 GMT
- [A-List] Chemical Weapons Found?,
Gary Santos Tue 08 Apr 2003, 12:39 GMT
- [A-List] Fw: CP of Britain, Stop The Predatory Imperialist War,
Christopher Black Tue 08 Apr 2003, 12:38 GMT
- [A-List] A Democratic Iraq? Don't Hold Your Breath,
Gary Santos Tue 08 Apr 2003, 04:30 GMT
- [A-List] [Fwd: I AM WRITING FROM IRAQ / I NEED YOUR HELP],
Henry C.K. Liu Tue 08 Apr 2003, 04:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]