[A-List] UK Labor Party: Protecting Paedophile Ring?

["annewilliamson" <annewilliamson@xxxxxxx>]

Tony Blair, British Freemasons Accused Of Pedophilia
British Government Orders State-Run Press Not To Cover Story

3/12/03 11:09:10 AM
Network54.com

London, England --
Blair's Protection of Elite Paedophile Rings Spells the End

March 11 2003 at 5:33 PM SAJ
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/blair_protection.html

Exclusive to Propaganda Matrix.com by Mike James in Frankfurt: March 11
2003

NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to
sue Scotland's leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that
he
not only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for
child
killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile
ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.

On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a
junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning
the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century Scottish
town
of Dunblane.

The controversy is certain to topple the Blair government, which has
already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of
known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two
senior
ministers; and the case highlights the government's antipathy toward the
Sunday
Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things,
exposed the role played by the domestic securitym agency, MI5, in helping
the
IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities.

As reported by this journalist last month at Propaganda Matrix and Counter
Punch, and by the Sunday Herald's Home Affairs Editor, Neil Mackay, the
British intelligence services are actively engaged in preventing any
further child sex revelations that could incite further hostility to an
already
unpopular Prime Minister and destroy the morale of troops set to invade
Iraq.

An intelligence officer told Mackay that "a 'rolling' Cabinet committee
had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous
fall-out
for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur."

Some commentators, mindful that one of Tony Blair's closest confidante's
is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular
scandal,
and not Blair's repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may
well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption. The
Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have
used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has
responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the
arrest of
one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.

The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the
secrecy on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report were
banned from the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. Lord Cullen,
an establishment insider, also omitted and censored references to the
documents in his final report. Parents and teachers were advised to
concentrate
their efforts on a campaign to outlaw handguns instead of focusing on how
the
mentally unstable Freemason, already known by the police to be a
paedophile, had obtained a firearms licence for six handguns. Hamilton
allegedly
enjoyed good relations with both local Labour luminary George Robertson and
Michael Forsyth, the then Scottish Secretary of State and MP for Stirling.
Forsyth
congratulated and encouraged Hamilton for running a boy's club. Hamilton
was also found to have exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen
Elizabeth.

The rumours and allegations concerning Lord Robertson's ties to Hamilton,
and the possibility that the American intelligence services may be
blackmailing Tony Blair into continued support for a U.S. invasion of
Iraq, have been given fire by internet investigator and intelligence expert
Michael Keaney:

"An additional, and potentially explosive, aspect of US leverage over
Blair is the FBI's investigation of users of child porn websites which has
already claimed a number of high profile scalps. [....] The biggest two fish
that
come to mind are indeed high profile: firstly there is George Robertson, who
today has announced that he will step down as NATO Secretary General after
four
years and two months in the job. Were he to be fingered the fall out would
be spectacular but short-lived -- he's been a long time out of the cabinet
and is sufficiently distant from Tony to be regarded as not requiring the
presentational finesse of a "rolling" Cabinet committee, whatever that
might be. However, our second candidate is most certainly very closely
identified with the prime minister, and retains a high profile [and]
continues to
operate at a very high level indeed, whether in Europe, Japan, or even the
Middle
East."

"Peter Mandelson began political life as a member of the Communist Party,
soon "seeing the light" and instead getting involved with the
CIA/MI6-financed
Socialist International youth wing and the Labour Party, through which he
rose in parallel with his experience working at London Weekend Television
with
other A-list regulars like John Birt and Michael Maclay, now public
mouthpiece of Hakluyt, the private sector spook outfit run by a bunch of
"ex" MI6
types including the widow of ex-Labour leader John Smith. This sort of
background and connections makes Mandelson very useful in the sort of
corridors-and-
alleyways diplomacy and networking that is the real substance of
international
relations and intelligence gathering. [....] If Mandelson is indeed the
suspect, then the damage this could cause may fatally wound Blair."

"An interesting development that may, or may not, be related to this, is
the publication of an article in last Sunday's Observer by David
Aaronovitch. He and Mandelson are longtime friends, having been together in
the
Communist Party and at London Weekend TV. Aaronovitch was, until recently, a
leading
political commentator for the Independent, on whose "international advisory
board" (the standard vanity collection of august persons put together for
the ego of newspaper proprietors like Tony O'Reilly and Conrad Black) sits
Peter Mandelson."

"Since switching to the Guardian Media Group at the beginning of this year
or thereabouts, Aaronovitch authored an article on child abuse in which he
pleads for common sense to prevail, rather than the lynch mob: 'Strangely
I trust the police to act sensibly (because, like the analysts, they've seen
it all): it's the rest of us I worry about.'"

"That much depends upon the behaviour of the US Justice Department, which
ultimately has responsibility for the investigation, must be a worry for
Blair. One need only imagine how this must colour the views of John
Ashcroft regarding the moral fibre of British cabinet ministers and the
laxity of
the prime minister who chose them in the first place. How easy would it be
for
the suspect to be named in a story that miraculously surfaced outside of the
UK (thereby circumventing the D Notice and leading potentially to a re-run
of
the Spycatcher fiasco of 1987)?

"Whoever is on the suspects' list, we can see that already this 'rolling'
cabinet committee is busy leaking stories that serve at least to delay the
shock of the inevitable, eventual revelation, buying valuable time if
nothing else. Thus you can depend on the Guardian to save the day for Tony,
and
here's some helpful tip-offs courtesy of MI6 that help to distract from
what's
really going on, whilst bolstering the reputation for integrity and
financial
propriety that has marked Blair's dealings with businesspeople like Bernie
Ecclestone, Richard Desmond, Lakshmi Mittal, etc."

"I have come to the considered conclusion," says a correspondent of
Keaney, William Palfreman, "that the events surrounding the Dunblane
massacre, and
the subsequent submissions to the Cullen enquiry that have been put under to
100 years of secrecy, far out weigh in political significance issues such as
our opposition to the EU [and] what it entails. It is inconceivable that T
Blair, Jack Straw [and] Gordon Brown can survive in office as this matter
becomes
known. It totally undermines the Labour government, and could easily be a
case of the Queen feeling she has to use reserve powers to call an emergency
general election, such would be the loss of confidence."

"This scandal is far more important that anything that has happened here
in living memory, in fact I can think of no parallel for it. It certainly
pisses all over anything that happened to Kennedy or was done by Nixon. I am
surprised, given the gravity of this matter, that [an] attempt has yet to
be made on his life, for surely we are dealing with desperate people here.
It
also explains a few strange things, such as just why T Blair & co. were so
keen to ban all handguns, and why such obviously talentless nobodies like
George Robertson have risen from being backbench nobodies a couple of
years ago to Defence Secretary, and now Secretary-General of Nato."

"[....] Now where in this is there a national security risk so great, that
documents part of the public enquiry are now state secrets to be held for
100 years? Funny kind of public enquiry. Why, when Thomas Hamilton's
application for a gun licence was turned down, due to him being regarded as
a man of
unsound character [and] him being the object of several paedophilia
investigations, did his MP, our friend George Robertson (now Lord
Robertson, Secretary-General of NATO), write him a glowing character
reference, and
personally see to it that his application was successful, when he knew the
grounds for the original refusal were because he was suspected of
procuring boys for sexual services?"

"Or take a certain boat seized on Loch Ness [Loch Lomond] by the
Strathclyde Police. It is a very rare thing for assets to be seized in the
UK, as [there] are no asset-forfeiture laws. When it does happen, there is
normally a trial at least, with things only being seized if they are
proven to be bought with money proven to be consequence of a proven crime.
Even
then, they are sold by public auction. How come, then, was this very
valuable
boat sold for the tiny sum of £5000, without an auction, to none other than
our
friend Thomas Hamilton, a man of no financial means whatsoever, nor a
sailor, nor lived anywhere near any open water. Why did not the boats owners
complain about having their property stolen from them in this manner? I can
only
conclude because it was being used for some very serious criminal
activity, and those on board were merely glad to escape prosecution. Also,
it seems
rather odd in such circumstances that not only were the owners happy to
avoid prosecution enough to lose a valuable boat, but that the Strathclyde
Police were not willing to prosecute. And yet, after these improbable
events, it
wound up in none other than our friend Hamilton's hands. Could he have
been a blackmailer as well as a paedophile?"

"But the main thing is what might explain sections of the public enquiry
are now under the hundred year rule. There are only three levels of
secrecy in the UK for state secrets, the 30 year rule, the 80 year rule and
the 100
year rule. Normal secrets, like Cabinet discussions, government papers,
espionage, all that, are under the 30 year rule. Only a very small number of
things
ever reached the 80 year rule, particularly events in the Sudan with
Kitchener
in 1902, where it seems that an act of genocide was committed, and some
things that happened 1914-18, as well as things like potential peace
negotiations
in 1941, and just about everything to do with the IRA (after all, people are
still alive after 30 years) come under the 80 year rule. Of them, the
darkest of state secrets, when the events of '02 were getting a bit close to
their
limit for comfort, a further class of secrets was created to last a
hundred years, and tiny number of things were put in it - e.g. Kitchener in
'02,
some World War I things."

But none of these things can be said to apply to Dunblane. That was a case
of a common criminal [and] sexual pervert committing some fairly ordinary
murders, of a kind that happen from time to time. Even if a backbench
Labour MP was implicated, or may have been involved in a large paedophile
ring in
Scotland, that is not a matter of vital national importance. You have a
prosecution, there is a bit of a scandal, everyone is disgusted and one MP
goes to prison. Big deal: such things happen. You certainly would not make
such information a state secret just to save one unnamed backbench
nobody's miserable neck. Governments simply don't go to such extreme lengths
to
save nobodies - power broking just doesn't work like that. There must be
issues
of profound national importance working here, and I put it to you that
anything that involves certain events in Scotland is more likely to be
someone of
cabinet level than anything else.

If the physiologically flawed [although Thomas Hamilton was these were the
words of Tony Blair when speaking of Gordon Brown] Thomas Hamilton was the
centre of a paedophile ring in Scotland that procured boys to people of
the amongst the highest rank, and Tony Blair [and] Jack Straw covered this
up
by the Official Secrets Act (They would do the covering, as both the Prime
Minister's [and] Home Secretary's permission is needed to put some
something under the 100 year rule.) it is hard to see how they or their
close
colleges could possibly remain in office, even if they were never inclined
to such
flawed behaviour themselves. The government would fall."

That prospect seems to be energising a government now considered to be
fighting for its political life, even to the extent of killing the review
process by which some of the banned sections of the Cullen Report would be
made public, arguing that freedom of information would somehow harm other
abused children in Dunblane.

In a recent interview with the Guardian newspaper, Michael Matheson, the
Scottish National Party's shadow deputy justice minister, said: "There are
more documents covered by the 100-year rule than this police report. Some
of them have nothing whatsoever to do with children. We need to look at why
such a lengthy ban has been imposed on them. I have been contacted by a
number
of families affected by the tragedy who are anxious to ensure this
information becomes public. And so far we have no guarantee that it will. We
only have
a review."

"It is important we make available, if it is at all possible, any
information that is available about people in the public eye," said the
Scottish first minister, Jack McConnell.

When Tony Blair took office following a landslide victory in 1997, few
commentators would have suggested that this man would be willing to drag
his country into a war of unjustified aggression against a people that have
done no harm to the British public. Nor would anyone have surmised that a
Labour government would hitch its political fortunes to a shabby cabal of
fanatical neoconservative Zionists working to make real their much-touted
biblical
Armageddon. And no one could have predicted that Blair's nominally
"Christian" administration would transform itself into a licentious club of
flamboyant
homosexual cruisers and out-of-control paedophiles.

But it is now becoming shockingly clear that the slavish adherence of Tony
Blair and Jack Straw to the Bush line on Iraq may have less to do with
principled arguments, and much more to do with the fear of CIA and FBI
revelations that would make them two of the most hated politicians in
modern British political history.

There is only one way out for Tony Blair - resign.

(The British Labour government, 1997-2003. Rest In Peace.)