|
News Analysis January 13,
2003
- War is
really being delayed and alternative options are being discussed.
- This,
however, is unlikely for the following reasons:
- Military
preparations are not only continuing but intensifying. Only hours after ordering 35,000
extra troops to head for Iraq, the Pentagon ordered another 62,000 on
Sunday. Furthermore, such a large number of troops cannot be maintained for
too long in the region without military action.
- Other British and almost all American officials are still
saying that war is the most likely option.
- Last week
saw some high profile meetings between
American and Iraqi opposition leaders, indicating that preparations for a
post-Saddam Iraq are still continuing.
- The US/UK
have some hidden evidence that they believe will clearly show Saddam in breach
of the UN and guarantee backing for war from the UN Security Council, possibly
even with another resolution. So they are now in the process of giving the
impression that they want to avoid a war and are willing to give inspectors
the time they need until they release this information before Blix's January
27th report.
- The US has
decided to go to war without the UN. To cover its back and to quell opposition
in parliament and the country, the UK government is creating the impression it
wants to avoid a war and would like to go through the UN, so that when the US
announces they are going alone, Blair can claim he is forced to join so as to
influence and restrain the US.
-
Blix said in his latest report that his team had not found "any smoking guns", but that
Iraq's 12,000 page weapons declaration "failed to answer a great many
questions". Saddam, in his annual Army Day address, accused UN weapons
inspectors of being spies - possibly indicating that
when he feels he can no longer buy himself more time or when inspectors are
close to finding his weapons he would expel them.
-
|