A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [A-List] Big pig, little pig
So, could someone enlighten me. How come the US keeps subsidizing its
farmers, but requires that other countries, like Mexico, not do so?
Thanks,
Joanna
At 07:36 AM 12/22/2002 -0500, you wrote:
December 19,
2002
Nafta to Open Foodgates, Engulfing Rural Mexico
By GINGER THOMPSON
IRAPUATO, Mexico, Dec. 15 - A decade of hemispheric economic upheaval
finally turned Eugenio Guerrero's life upside down last Saturday. That
morning, he tried to auction off the pig farm that has supported his
family and some 50 others for two generations.
"It's true," read a flier that announced the sale. "We are
closing and auctioning everything."
>From now on Mr. Guerrero, 41, will dedicate himself to selling
paint.
The changes he has been forced to confront are being felt all over Mexico
as the country struggles to keep its balance, one foot in poverty, the
other seeking a toehold in prosperity through the North American Free
Trade Agreement.
Mr. Guerrero said he had barely been able to keep afloat since the treaty
began abolishing trade barriers between Mexico, the United States and
Canada nearly 10 years ago. Credit ran dry after a national economic
crisis devastated banks in 1995. The Mexican government ended most
agricultural subsidies, sending his costs through the roof. Pork prices
plunged as cheaper imports from the United States flooded Mexican
markets.
Now, Mr. Guerrero's last defense is being dismantled. Under Nafta, on
Jan. 1 tariffs on almost all agricultural imports from the United States
will end.
The looming deadline has consumed the attention of a nation where a
quarter of the population lives in rural areas, and produced warnings
about the possibility of unrest and increased migration across the
Mexican countryside and into the United States, as millions of peasants
are forced to abandon their tiny fields.
In recent weeks, hundreds of thousands of Mexican farmers and their
supporters have blocked highways and border crossings. They have
temporarily shut down gas and electricity installations, and even burst
into Congress on horseback.
President Vicente Fox's government is short of cash and has offered
little more than moral support. "In the world today, all sectors
have to adapt to the new competitive conditions," the president
said. "Agriculture cannot be the exception."
Meanwhile, some, like Mr. Guerrero, grope for ways to hold on to a
middle-class way of life, if not their farms. For him, Saturday was the
start of another life.
That morning, Mr. Guerrero, the father of two adolescent sons, held an
auction to begin selling off half of his 2,000 pigs. There was no way, he
said, that the family business could compete against large-scale pork
producers in the United States, who now hold 40 percent of the Mexican
market.
In the United States, a pig can be raised and sold in Iowa for a fifth of
what it would cost to raise and sell one in Irapuato. Since Nafta took
effect, a third of Mexico's 18,000 swine producers have gone out of
business, according to the Mexican Hog Farmers Association.
Mr. Guerrero said he had laid off all but five of his workers. Most told
him they would emigrate to the United States illegally in search of a new
start.
Mr. Guerrero, however, decided to start over at home. He closed
Saturday's auction with the sale of a hulking black and white male that
went for 40 percent less than he was asking. A few hours later, more
resigned than rejoicing, he presided over the grand opening of his new
paint store.
"Mexico will not be a country of producers, it is going to become a
country of salesmen," he lamented. "The problem with that is we
are putting our independence at risk. We are becoming a country that
depends on foreigners for food."
Mr. Guerrero said he accepted the survival-of-the-fittest laws of free
trade. "But Mexico entered the free trade game with serious
disadvantages," he added. "Naturally, we are the
losers."
It was widely predicted before Nafta took effect on Jan. 1, 1994, that
free trade would create a new world of economic winners and losers.
Mexico has become the world's ninth largest economy and a powerhouse in
the export of manufactured goods. Hundreds of thousands of jobs were
created, most of them in assembly plants called maquiladoras.
Food imports from the United States have doubled, from $3.6 billion a
year to $7.4 billion. But the food trade has also boomed in the opposite
direction.
Exports to the United States, mostly products made by large Mexican and
transnational food processing corporations, have increased from $2.7
billion to nearly $5.3 billion. Among the most notable winners are
companies like Grupo Bimbo, Mexico's largest food company, which has
taken advantage of cheap grain imports.
Other winners are Maseca, which has become the world's largest producer
of cornmeal and tortillas, and Sigma, which imports cheap pork parts and
poultry pastes from the United States to make sandwich meats.
Fruit and vegetable farmers, who benefit from longer seasons of sunshine
and cheaper labor than their American competitors, have also increased
their exports to the United States under Nafta.
But many observers say the losses outweigh the gains. Mexico's most
difficult challenge has been the fate of some 25 million people who live
in the countryside.
Although agriculture represents less than 5 percent of the gross domestic
product, about one in five working Mexicans are directly involved in it.
The overwhelming majority are poor subsistence farmers, who work plots as
small as two acres. However, midsized farmers are also being
devastated.
Poultry farmers, too, are expected to be hit hard when remaining tariffs
are lifted on Jan. 1. Currently Mexico places a 48 percent tariff on
poultry.
As much as Nafta ignited an economic evolution, said analysts, it has
also set off a kind of social landslide as the government struggles, in
the span of a decade, to move millions of people from farming into other
ways of life. The impact is likely to be felt on both sides of the
border.
Some 700,000 people are expected to lose jobs in farming and other food
industries next year, warned Armando Paredes Arroyo, president of the
National Agriculture Commission. Many may join the estimated 300,000
Mexicans a year who make the illegal journey to the United States. Most
are peasant farmers.
Farm leaders pointed to President Bush's farm bill, which promised $180
billion in spending over the next 10 years, as an example of unfair trade
practices by the United States. A typical farmer in Mexico receives $722
a year in government subsidies, officials say, while the average American
farmer will receive more than $20,000 under the bill signed by President
Bush.
President Fox, however, rejected calls to renegotiate or suspend Nafta.
The government says the farming crisis is linked in large part to the
legacy of government corruption and mismanagement by the Institutional
Revolutionary Party, which controlled Mexico for seven decades.
In the budget approved last week, the Mexican government pledged $10.2
billion in spending on agriculture next year, an increase of about 4
percent over last year. However, farmers complain, only $4.5 billion will
go directly to subsidies.
Copyright The New York Times Company
- Thread context:
- [A-List] In the shadow of coming war - iht.com December 23, 2002,
Ralph Johansen Mon 23 Dec 2002, 10:14 GMT
- [A-List] Venezuela - Chronology of the Strike that Wasn't,
Ralph Johansen Mon 23 Dec 2002, 10:13 GMT
- Re: [A-List] US cnsored 8000 pages of Iraq Report,
Ralph Johansen Mon 23 Dec 2002, 02:16 GMT
- [A-List] Sitios sobre el proceso bolivariano / URLs on the Bolivarian process,
Nestor Gorojovsky Mon 23 Dec 2002, 01:08 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Big pig, little pig,
joanna bujes Mon 23 Dec 2002, 01:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]