A-list
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[A-List] Re: Brian Czech's response to Louis Proyect's critique



I thank Louis Proyect for his critique of my book, Shoveling Fuel for a Runaway Train. Having been a co-member of at least 2 listservers, I know Proyect has outstanding insight pertaining to macroeconomics and political economy. In fact, I’ll go so far as agreeing with his current critique until the last few paragraphs. Two things happen at that point, however, that compel me to respond: 1) He turns his critique from Shoveling Fuel to the Carrying Capacity Network, which I have nothing to do with, and; 2) His critique essentially ends with Part 1 of Shoveling Fuel! For people on these lists, Part 2 on the steady state revolution (especially the class structure thereof) is probably of greater interest than Part 1.

I’m not sure how or why this happened. I do think I have irked various economists and activists by twisting Marx’s famous expropriation pronouncement to reflect the class structure of the steady state revolution (www.steadystate.org). However, the reality I perceive is this: The American constitutional, capitalist democracy is in like Flynn. Surely it will fall one day, as all have, but not before major ecological havoc dooms whatever form of political economy comes in its wake. I searched for a social movement to “save the planet” that could function in American democracy, capitalistic as it currently is, socialistic as it may evolve, and that is what Part 2 is all about.

I hope more of you read it without drawing premature conclusions about the adequacy of the steady state revolution class structure to effect real change in consumerism. A common critique of “skimmers” (and I don’t mean Proyect, who had no comments at all about Part 2) has been that, by identifying the upper 1 percentile as the liquidating class and setting them up for castigation by the steady state class, I have set the bar way too high. What they have invariably missed is the section on trickle-down consumption, not to mention the powerful political rationale for beginning the steady state revolution with an extremely skewed consumer class structure.

You can get a better idea of what I’m talking about by reading sample chapter 6, available at the website.

Brian Czech,
Arlington, VA





Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]