Re: [A-List] US imperialism: "no whitewash at the White House"?

["Henry C.K. Liu" <hliu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kissinger is put there to save the Saudi royal house.  He is going to issue a
report to absolve Suadi Arabia from 9:11.  The irony is that rumor of Saudi
finance of Al Quada is what keeps the Saudi royal house from being overthrown by
Arab nationalism.  Kissinger can save the Saudi royal house from the US, but he
will by doing so condamn the Saudi royal house to a fate of demise from
revolutionary agitation, at which point the US will occupy Saudi Arabia to save
it.

Henry C.K. Liu



Annewilliamson wrote:

> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Keaney" <michael.keaney@xxxxxx>
> To: <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:49 AM
> Subject: [A-List] US imperialism: "no whitewash at the White House"?
>
> > Bush asks Kissinger to head terror investigation
> > By Rupert Cornwell in Washington
> > The Independent, 28 November 2002
> >
> > The former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was named by George Bush
> > yesterday to head a new independent commission to investigate the 11
> > September attacks and the failure of American intelligence services to
> > detect the worst terrorist outrage in the country's history.
>
> Just when I think Bush has executed the "ultimate" in outrageous acts
> (Defense of the Homeland, which not only hollows out the Bill of Rights but
> also changes the entire structure of the Federal govt, a point not yet
> noticed or commented upon publicly), he outdoes himself.  A quick check of
> pro-Bush websites indicates that even his ill-informed, easily-manipulated
> grass roots supporters who label themselves "conservatives" are gape-mouthed
> at the news.....yet the tone of  The Independent's report does not surprise,
> since corporate media has so long sustained Kissinger's undeserved
> "statesman" reputation they will - if not eagerly - at least dutifully go
> about their current task of reminding the people of Kissinger's
> "heavyweight" status.
>
> This move does offer at least an opportunity for a small entertainment, i.e.
> the response of Christopher Hitchens.  How can the esteemed author continue
> supporting Bush, leader of the world's largest and most deeply indebted
> corporate state, and his delusional, destructive, opportunistic, and
> diversionary War on Terror, after having written a book-length of indictment
> of Kissinger as a war criminal?
>
> -A.