Re: [A-List] FW: "911 and its Meta-Politics" - Steve Martinot (analytical, c 10pp) (fwd)

[Bob Enoch <bobenoch@xxxxxxx>]

This is a fine, timely article.

I don't think Henrys' response quite does it justice though.
Martinots' article makes it very clear that there are, at the least, huge
holes in the official
story about Sept, 11.
I think it is time that some attempt be made to answer the factual points
made by Martinot.
Avoiding these facts simply underlines the aptness of his observation that
"one's deep heart-felt
desire is that the government account actually be the true account."

Henry suggests that the US regime has such control over the minds of the
people that it didn't need the 9/11 effect to carry out its program.
Their support is not so deep as you suppose, and they could never have taken
the steps they have taken without the fear, and the National hubris
generated and sustained by 9/11.
I think Martinot, and others have made a case that they must have been
implicated.
Let us, this time, discuss the evidence itself, and see where it leads.

Bob