A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] UK legitimation crisis: Glaxo SmithKline
Profits down, shares sinking. But boss on £7m says it's not enough
Demand will test shareholders' new right to block big pay awards
Julia Finch and Jill Treanor
Monday November 18, 2002
The Guardian
One of Britain's highest paid chief executives is in line for a huge pay
increase that will reignite shareholder anger over boardroom pay.
Jean-Pierre Garnier, chief executive of drugs group GlaxoSmithKline, earned
a total package of some £7m last year. Yet he is feeling underpaid, is said
to need more money to keep motivated, and now wants what one investor called
a "massive" increase, even though the company's profits and shares sank last
year.
His demands will be a test case under the government's new rules to give
shareholders the right to block big pay awards.
It has emerged that GlaxoSmithKline, whose products range from the
controversial anti-depressant Seroxat to Ribena, is planning a series of
secret meetings with key shareholders to get their backing for Mr Garnier's
new pay deal before going public with the details.
The Guardian has learned that the 54-year-old French-born executive, who
guards his privacy and is known throughout the drugs' business simply as JP,
wants nearly one million share options and around 200,000 free shares. This
is more than double the package he received last year.
The one million shares are currently worth around £12.5m. He would be
awarded them at a discount, and would then receive any profit from a rise in
the share price. The free shares he wants are currently worth £2.5m, and Mr
Garnier would get extra profits from any share price increase, even if the
rise was prompted only by a general rise in the stock market.
Shareholders, who have been told by letter of the planned pay rise, are
already angry. They have long feared US-style pay deals being imported to UK
companies, because they would ratchet up salaries throughout Britain's
boardrooms.
A spokesman for the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), whose
members control one third of the stock market, said: "Shareholders are going
to be very concerned at increases of this scale, especially given the damage
that has been done to shareholder value".
Mr Garnier's timing is certainly not the best. The GlaxoSmithKline share
price has fallen from more than £18 when Mr Garnier took over in April 2000
to £12.50, and last year the group's profits fell from £6bn to £4.5bn.
The decline was due to a large extent to the huge costs incurred when
GlaxoWellcome merged with SmithKline Beecham to form the world's second
biggest drugs group, but that merger has been a far from overwhelming
success. The idea was to create a vast research machine which would discover
new drugs at a faster rate. But Mr Garnier has faced criticism in recent
months because its scientists have so far failed to come up with any new
blockbuster treatments.
The rationale behind the merger was also called into question when the
company's own research chief said that big was not necessarily best when it
came to finding new medicines, and that universities had just as much chance
of finding new compounds.
The company then split its research efforts into six separate divisions to
be run almost as separate companies, only for the lead scientists heading
three of these units to quit this year. Insiders say morale is low, and it
is likely to take a nosedive as details of Mr Garnier's pay demands - the
proposals apply only to him and none of his senior staff - become the
subject of office gossip at the company's brand new headquarters in west
London.
According to the recent Guardian/Inbucon executive pay survey, Mr Garnier
was the third highest paid FTSE-100 company boss last year, behind Bart
Becht of Reckitt Benckiser and Tony Ball of BSkyB.
However, the company is telling its shareholders he should not be measured
against his UK peers, but against much more highly paid American executives.
According to shareholders this is the only reason they have been given to
explain the new pay demand.
A spokesman for the company said it was "inappropriate to discuss private
meetings" but suggested Mr Garnier also needed the attraction of more money
to keep him motivated: "GSK aims to have remuneration policies and
programmes that will enable it to recruit, retain and motivate the top
calibre executive talents that it needs".
The new plan has been put together by a six-strong committee of
non-executive directors headed by an American, John Young, 69, who is also
on the board of oil giant Chevron Texaco and a number of biotech companies.
Also on the committee is Sir Roger Hurn, the former chairman of Marconi who
was forced to stand down when the company faced collapse. The Marconi
scandal also cost him the chairman's seat at the Prudential insurance
company.
Earlier this year the Pru was forced to back down when it proposed an £18m
pay deal for its top executives.
NAPF said it would also be examining the terms of Mr Garnier's pension. As
part of his existing pay deal he is guaranteed a pension of £1m a year, the
highest for any FTSE boss. He is also entitled to up to six years' extra
contributions from the company, even if he is fired.
The NAPF spokesman said: "We do not want to see pensions used as a backdoor
way of giving directors extra rewards". Earlier this year GlaxoSmithKline
closed its final salary pension scheme for its staff.
Mr Garnier, a pharmacologist and Fulbright Scholar, runs GSK from an office
in Philadelphia. A large proportion of the company's sales and shareholders
is in the US.
One shareholder said yesterday: "He runs it as though it is an American
company. But Glaxo will have an uphill struggle with what they are trying to
do. He is already paid an awful lot, and it is not clear what the
performance is that merits this."
>From Horlicks to HIV drug: how they sell
Prescription drugs
Seroxat
Antidepressant, also used for treatment of anxiety disorders
2001 sales: £1.86bn
Augmentin
Antibiotic for treatment of respiratory tract infections
Sales: £1.42bn
Flixotide
Inhaled steroid for treatment of respiratory inflammation Sales: £915m
Seretide
Bronchodilator and anti- inflammatory in single inhaler for asthma
Sales: £850m
Imigran
For treatment of migraine
Sales: £758m
Avandia
New class of medicines used to treat type 2 diabetes
Sales: £707m
Combivir
Combination of Retrovir and Epivir for HIV patients
Sales: £606m
Zofran
Anti-nausea drug for chemotherapy patients
Sales: £601m
Ventolin
Short-acting bronchodilator for treatment of asthma
Sales: £601m
Direct-to-consumer products
Aquafresh
Toothpaste
Sales: £401m
Lucozade
Glucose energy drink
Sales: £401m
Ribena
Vitamin C-enriched juice drinks
Sales: £182m
Panadol
Analgesic for fever and pain
Sales: £171m
Horlicks
Nutritional drink
Sales: £174m
Nicorette/Nicoderm/ NiQuitin
Smoking control gum and patches
Sales: £337m
- Thread context:
- [A-List] Afghanistan: the blowback continues, (continued)
- [A-List] Britain/US split: NATO, EU,
Michael Keaney Mon 18 Nov 2002, 12:49 GMT
- [A-List] UK legitimation crisis: Glaxo SmithKline,
Michael Keaney Mon 18 Nov 2002, 12:46 GMT
- [A-List] EU integration struggles: Benn critique,
Michael Keaney Mon 18 Nov 2002, 12:45 GMT
- [A-List] US imperialism: liberating women?,
Michael Keaney Mon 18 Nov 2002, 12:41 GMT
- [A-List] British empire loyalists no. 95,
Michael Keaney Mon 18 Nov 2002, 11:45 GMT
- [A-List] UK state: ruling class split,
Michael Keaney Mon 18 Nov 2002, 11:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]