|
Uribe Velez: A
Regional Danger The ascension of Alvaro
Uribe Velez to the Presidency of Colombia signifies the apogee of the violence
and a new war surge that threatens to overflow the Colombian borders and involve
the countries of the region. An analysis by the editor of Ecuador’s Opción
Magazine: 12.11.2002 By Ramiro Vinueza Land of coffee and
of cumbia music, of happy men and women and workers, Colombia constitutes the
fourth largest economy of Latin America, even though it has been lashed by the
political violence generated by the most doctrinaire forces of the dominant
classes that have bled the Colombian people for many decades. The politics
sketched by the new government of Alvaro Uribe, mark a retreat from the
political solution to the conflict, demanded by diverse sectors from within
Colombia as much as without. This is a new panorama in which the financial and
military intervention of the North Americans is most evident; in it, immense
financial resources for the war would be extracted at the cost of more poverty
and more misery for the Colombian people and of a larger number of displaced and
dead. Victory over the
Colombian guerillas is a strategic and vital matter for the United States
because they cannot permit the existence of, three hours from Miami, this bad
example that can be emulated by youth and people that, seeing the state of
social decadence in the continent, decide also to opt for this road. For this
the guerilla is in the eye of imperialism, and, because Colombia opens onto both
oceans, its borders face as much toward the United States and toward Latin
America, for this the country is a strategic political objective.
The Sinister
Connections of Uribe Velez Uribe, ultraright
politician to who is attributed strong connections to narco-trafficking, won the
elections with the support of the dissidents of the Liberal Party and with the
support of the Conservative Party of [former President] Pastrana. The Colombian
Bourgeois began a search for the prototype of the State man of “hard hand” that
drives things within the parameters of neo-liberalism, with pro-fascist
politics, in the Gaviria style, that of a quick solution to the conflict by way
of war, and in this profile Uribe Velez fits perfectly. President Uribe is
surrounded by sinister persons such as the Minister of Interior and of Justice,
Fernando Londoño, author of the ‘State of Internal Commotion’ and the plan to
recruit 1 million Colombians for an informant network to serve the State.
Londoño is an old supporter of the Spanish dictator Franco, who has already
threatened the Justice Courts, defenders of human rights, and those he calls
advisors to the guerilla armies and to the ecologist parties, like anonymous
communist societies. Another character
of this macabre type is Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, today in charge of National
Security, who, according to some sources is a recognized senior hitman that
until recently walked the streets of Medellín strongly armed. Of him they say
that he worked for Pablo Escobar during the time that Escobar had great power;
also it is known that the DEA had investigated him for coca exportation between
the years ’89-’93. Don Pedro Juan, as his killers call him, was security adviser
for Uribe in Antioquia, the period in which they produced three massacres each
week; is also, as he himself says, personal friend of Carlos Castaño, leader of
the paramilitaries of the AUC. Uribe doesn’t
have it easy Uribe, to implement
a politics of genocide, will have to return to the fortification and growth of
the armed forces, under his strategy of National Security, which will cost more
deaths and more poverty to the people and will signify to them also, a major
submission to North American politics and the search of major support in the
region. Nonetheless, not the entire road is clear for the new government; we
will see. 1. Although the
Colombian armed forces are the best trained of Latin America in
counterinsurgency, with all the technology, human and economic resources, given
by the Pentagon during the last 40 years, has been incapable of reversing the
course of the war. This military lives permanently defeated: politically it
doesn’t have any national endorsement, because of immorality and corruption; and
militarily it doesn’t present any success or strategic conquest against the
insurgency. 2. Although the
social base the supports the politics of Uribe is important (5 million 300,000
votes) it does not consitute even the majority of city dwellers that voted (24
million) and much less the feeling of the total of the 42 million of Colombia.
3. The resources
that the Colombian state must direct in order to confront this war will be
financed with war bonds, with the elimination of social services and of labor
rights, the extension of the work day and the time of retirement and with more
taxes for the population. These measures are thought to collect 2 of the 4
thousand million dollars that the Colombian state is promising to contribute to
the war. The social organizations and the populace are already expressing their
frontal opposition and preparing themselves to battle against these measures.
4. President Uribe,
betting on the State of Internal Commotion (state of exception) and to the
restriction of democracy, doesn’t try anything that has not been practiced by
the past 15 governments, all of them failed, aspiring to give it a military
solution to the insurgency problem, that is already more than forty years old:
Ignorant bourgeois politics that pretend ignorance of the historic and social
factors that gave rise to the insurgency and because of which it is sustained
and grows. 5. The principal
guerilla organizations, FARC and ELN have shown that they will not accept a
dialogue requiring disarmament nor demobilization of their forces and are
insisting, the same as other sectors, on a politically negotiated solution to
the conflict that includes a series of demands of democratic character, of
economic social and institutional reforms. 6. The politics of
blackmail and impunity that the US demands to the government of Uribe, met the
opposition of important political and social sectors that see as a danger the
signatures on an agreement for which US soldiers and personnel that participate
in military operations in the interior of Colombia cannot be judged or detained.
To this is added,
the refusal of the Venezuelan government to loan their territory for the
installation of military bases and to intervene in an eventual armed conflict;
Brasil, Chile, and Peru until now looked with skepticism at the problem and
proposed the necessity of a political solution to the conflict; Meanwhile there
is also the perception that the huge growth of the Colombian armed forces can
produce a overflow of these more than of the guerillas to their
territories. Ecuador is not the
exception, already having surrendered the base at Manta and has mobilized 10.000
troops on the northern border which has shown the disposition of this government
to apply the North Americans’ directives, although many voices, in which is
included those of high officials active and retired, are speaking in opposition
to intervention in a war that would bring disastrous consequences to the
country. Colombia’s
Statistics 1. Population,
Poverty and Indigence 2. The principal
enemy of Uribe is the popular Colombian movement that resists and struggles
"What is logical to the oppressor is not logical to
the oppressed."
-Malcolm X
|
- [A-List] UK state: manipulating US hegemony?, Michael Keaney Thu 14 Nov 2002, 14:00 GMT
- [A-List] Italy: Berlusconi the clement?, Michael Keaney Thu 14 Nov 2002, 13:57 GMT
- [A-List] UK labour militancy: postal workers, Michael Keaney Thu 14 Nov 2002, 13:56 GMT
- [A-List] UK public order & labour militancy, Michael Keaney Thu 14 Nov 2002, 13:46 GMT
- [A-List] Vinueza on Uribe, bon moun Thu 14 Nov 2002, 11:35 GMT
- [A-List] Ecuador: dilemmas of development, Michael Keaney Wed 13 Nov 2002, 13:07 GMT
- [A-List] US legitimation crisis: Enron, Michael Keaney Wed 13 Nov 2002, 13:04 GMT
- [A-List] US health care: unhealthy accumulation, Michael Keaney Wed 13 Nov 2002, 13:00 GMT
- [A-List] US state: Powell victory?, Michael Keaney Wed 13 Nov 2002, 12:57 GMT