A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] UK labour militancy & public order
Fire chiefs say strike should be declared illegal
By Paul Waugh, Deputy Political Editor
The Independent, 30 October 2002
Government law officers have been asked to determine whether the threatened
firefighters' strike could be declared illegal and strikers sent to jail for
putting lives at risk.
The hardline tactic was revealed ahead of a meeting in London today between
fire authority employers and the FBU in an attempt to find a settlement.
Both sides are being guarded about the chances of a breakthrough in the
two-day negotiations on pay and the proposed Bain review of firefighters'
conditions.
The Independent has learnt that one fire authority has asked the Attorney
General, Lord Goldsmith, if a strike can be declared illegal under Tory
employment laws. The issue is understood to have been discussed at last
week's meeting of the Government's national emergencies committee, Cobra.
The 1992 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act has a section
which deems strikers who put public safety at risk to have committed a
criminal act punishable by up to three months in prison. Section 240 (1)
makes clear that an individual will break the law if he "wilfully or
maliciously" breaks his contract while "knowing or having reasonable cause
to believe" his action will "endanger human life or cause serious bodily
injury".
Although the FBU has balloted its members and called a legal strike, that
would offer no defence from the criminal charge. Last night, a government
source said the Attorney General's judgment was that attempting to declare a
strike illegal was "a non-starter".
Hopes of a settlement rose at the weekend when the union agreed to suspend
its first two 48-hour stoppages, the first due yesterday, after the
intervention of John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister. But some employers
are determined not to give ground to the FBU's pay claim of 40 per cent.
Mr Prescott indicated to Andy Gilchrist, the FBU leader,that the employers
could offer "something extra" to their 4 per cent pay offer if productivity
could be improved. Local authority employers will today repeat their
insistence that any deal would have to be linked to modernisation of
practices, be consistent with the Bain review and be government funded.
- Thread context:
- [A-List] EU integration struggles: CAP reform,
Michael Keaney Mon 28 Oct 2002, 14:19 GMT
- [A-List] EU integration struggles,
Michael Keaney Mon 28 Oct 2002, 14:16 GMT
- [A-List] UK labour militancy & public order,
Michael Keaney Mon 28 Oct 2002, 14:05 GMT
- [A-List] UK news media: Birt's mission to explain deconstructed,
Michael Keaney Mon 28 Oct 2002, 14:01 GMT
- [A-List] US state: Christian Coalition & Israel,
Michael Keaney Mon 28 Oct 2002, 13:42 GMT
- [A-List] UK eurozone membership,
Michael Keaney Mon 28 Oct 2002, 13:40 GMT
- [A-List] New Labour as the triumph of Cold War liberalism,
Michael Keaney Mon 28 Oct 2002, 13:30 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]