An unemployment rate of 3.9 percent happened, with or without hindsight. Corporate earnings misstatements do not erase that fact.
It makes sense that at some prior period, the process leading up to a state of overproduction or excess capacity would have generated tight labor markets and rising wages.
I think we could say you need a period of good times in order for an economy to get into trouble.
I don't know what your point is. An unemployment rate of 3.9% sounds really good until you stop and consider that a vast majority of working people, during this period, saw their earning power and living standards drop....all while productivity demands were intensified.
Many of these people will shortly be left without work (myself possibly included) and may not be able to find work for years.
As for the "good times" -- they were reserved for a small percentage. The rest of us are seeing our jobs, pensions and savings wiped out.
Joanna
- [A-List] Kagarlitsky on Putin, Sabri Oncu Sun 27 Oct 2002, 22:03 GMT
- [A-List] Fwd: EWP, 2nd International and the fall of the fSU, Mark Jones Sat 26 Oct 2002, 10:19 GMT
- [A-List] "The Late '90s Never Happened", Louis Proyect Fri 25 Oct 2002, 20:25 GMT
- RE: [A-List] "The Late '90s Never Happened", Max Sawicky Fri 25 Oct 2002, 21:20 GMT
- RE: [A-List] "The Late '90s Never Happened", joanna bujes Fri 25 Oct 2002, 21:41 GMT
- RE: [A-List] "The Late '90s Never Happened", Max Sawicky Fri 25 Oct 2002, 21:58 GMT
- RE: [A-List] "The Late '90s Never Happened", joanna bujes Fri 25 Oct 2002, 22:16 GMT
- Re: [A-List] "The Late '90s Never Happened", Annewilliamson Sat 26 Oct 2002, 00:14 GMT
- Re: [A-List] "The Late '90s Never Happened", Annewilliamson Sat 26 Oct 2002, 00:08 GMT