A-list
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[A-List] UK eurozone membership: trade unions split



Labour backers split over pro-euro stance
By Barrie Clement Labour Editor
The Independent, 12 September 2002

A deep split in Labour ranks over the merits of the euro was exposed
yesterday as the party's biggest affiliates clashed over the single
currency at the TUC conference in Blackpool.

A pro-euro declaration by the TUC's ruling council was passed, but amid
deep concern about the impact of the currency on public services. Even
those backing the official position expressed anxiety about the
potential effect of joining the monetary system without safeguards.

Unison, Labour's biggest backer, together with the Transport and General
Workers' Union (TGWU), its third largest backer, opposed the statement,
while Amicus and the GMB general union backed it. The division will
almost certainly reappear at the Labour Party conference in two weeks'
time.

Bill Morris, general secretary of the TGWU, said Britain would have
choose between the euro and the maintenance of quality social provision
and decent hospitals and schools.

Arguing that a referendum on the currency should be postponed until the
next parliament, he said rushing a decision would mean: "Hello euro,
goodbye public services."

British manufacturing needed more than a "one-off gamble" of joining the
euro, he said. It needed investment and higher skills. He pointed out
that unemployment had risen in both France and Germany.

He described the eurozone as a "rip-off Europe" where retailers had
exploited the introduction of the currency by increasing prices.

Greg Tucker of the RMT rail union - another important Labour Party
affiliate - said that on top of Gordon Brown's five tests his union
would put forward five of their own: Was the euro designed to benefit
workers or multinationals? Did the euro represent democracy or the
concentration of power? Did the euro challenge the neo-liberal agenda or
integrate it into the heart of the European Union? Did the currency
strike at the heart of social provision? Would it create jobs or destroy
them?

John Edmonds, leader of the GMB, who spoke in favour the general council
statement, said later that it had been passed by a convincing majority.
On a card vote 3,514,000 voted for the statement and 2,313,000 against.
Mr Edmonds said: "The Prime Minister tells us that we should commit
ourselves to Europe. That commitment should start at the top. Thirty
years in the European Union and still ministers yearn to be regarded as
a special friend not of France and Germany, but of the American
President."

The "no" campaign said the TUC statement was less pro-euro that previous
declarations. A spokesman said that it raised concerns about public
services and price rises which had not been expressed by the union
movement before.

"The whole momentum of the TUC congress has been against the euro," the
spokesman said.




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]