A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] UK corporate state: class war from above
- To: "A-List (E-mail)" <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [A-List] UK corporate state: class war from above
- From: "Keaney Michael" <Michael.Keaney@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:02:17 +0200
- Thread-index: AcHMIa7Emy1feTf3EdaZBQAQWtb4aQ==
- Thread-topic: UK corporate state: class war from above
No 10 failing to help lowest paid, says ex-adviser
Kevin Maguire
Friday March 15, 2002
The Guardian
Downing Street is accused of seeking to drive down the wages of low paid
workers in a scathing attack launched today by a former No 10 adviser.
Jon Cruddas, now Labour MP for Dagenham, warns that some members of the
government are prepared to see the earnings of employees fall to make
privatisation succeed when their jobs are transferred to private
companies.
The result, he says, is the effective acceptance of "growing inequality"
by prominent new Labour figures, when the party is officially committed
to a fairer Britain.
Mr Cruddas was involved in bitter internal battles over the minimum wage
and employment rights during Labour's first term as he fought attempts
by Blairite officials and ministers to accommodate Confederation of
British Industry objections.
His warning will fuel union concerns that Downing Street is seeking to
renege on promises by health secretary Alan Milburn and local government
secretary Stephen Byers to protect the terms and conditions of public
staff transferred to private firms.
"Why are elements in the Government so hostile to labour market
regulation? And why is it that every single labour market initiative has
to be fought line by line, almost street by street?" writes Mr Cruddas
in the latest edition of Tribune, the leftwing weekly.
"Why are we now seeking to rewrite, or de-write, earlier commitments
made to protect people at work?
"This ideological hostility to regulation is not simply the product of
deference to corporate wealth and power. Its basis lies in the
conception of the 'new economy' that underpins much government language
and action."
Mr Cruddas, a former academic, says official statistics collected in the
labour force survey show claims by adherents of the so-called new
economy, who said jobs would be replaced by self-employment, were
exaggerated, if not wrong. Opposing the protection of pay and pensions
for those in services contracted to private firms, he adds, will hit
Labour's traditional voters hardest.
"At best, it tacitly supports the growing inequality. At worst, it is
culpable in a strategy that actively intensifies the exploitation of big
parts of the working class," he says.
Full article at:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/labour/story/0,9061,667744,00.html
Michael Keaney
Mercuria Business School
Martinlaaksontie 36
01620 Vantaa
Finland
michael.keaney@xxxxxx
- Thread context:
- [A-List] Re: the Communist Manifesto: critique,
Andre Gunder Frank Sat 16 Mar 2002, 00:14 GMT
- [A-List] UK corporate state: tax shelters,
Keaney Michael Fri 15 Mar 2002, 13:27 GMT
- [A-List] UK military rearmament,
Keaney Michael Fri 15 Mar 2002, 13:09 GMT
- [A-List] UK corporate state: class war from above,
Keaney Michael Fri 15 Mar 2002, 13:03 GMT
- [A-List] The Policy Network: China,
Keaney Michael Fri 15 Mar 2002, 12:51 GMT
- [A-List] Arline & Jim Prigoff Presentation on World Social Forum @ Sacto. Marxist School,
Seth Sandronsky Fri 15 Mar 2002, 12:48 GMT
- [A-List] London Review of Books,
Keaney Michael Fri 15 Mar 2002, 12:45 GMT
- [A-List] US fiscal crisis,
Keaney Michael Fri 15 Mar 2002, 12:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]